conceptfasad.blogg.se

1. #Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata serial#
2. #Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata full#
3. #Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata portable#
4. #Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata software#
5. #Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata Pc#

Any feedback on this from the actual Avid community would be really helpful. I'm interested in hearing about actual experiences from people who currently use external media drives. The general question is if the faster external interfaces such as esata or usb 3.0 are no longer the bottleneck when running single drives.

#Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata full#

1.5 Gb/s), which would mean that the interface itself would still allow current 7200 rpm drives (including both sata II and the newer sata III drives ) to run at their full sustained throughput speeds, but I'm finding it difficult to confirm or deny this. I've read that esata is "supposed" to be able to reach full sata I speed (i.e. I'm therefore curious if a similar situation applies to other external interfaces like esata or usb 3.0, and if so, what kind of maximum speeds I could expect from these in the real world. My experience with usb 2.0 drives (NOT the newer usb 3.0 drives) is that at best, they only reach about half (or less) of usb 2.0's maximum bandwidth. Is there any general consensus as to what the type of external drive interface is best for this application - i.e.

#Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata Pc#

You may even find it faster than USB if you have a lot of other USB devices connected to the PC at the same time.I've always used internal drives for media (sata II - 3.0 Gb/s at the moment), but I'm considering switching my paradigm to external media drives for organizational purposes. If you are concerned about storage alone, particularly for work projects connecting to a single PC, then eSATA is a totally valid choice. Even if the PC or Mac you're connecting to has older USB 1.1 or USB 2.0 ports, the peripheral will at least connect and transfer data, albeit at a slower rate.

So which do you use? If you're concerned about conveying your data from PC to PC, then USB 3.0 is the undoubted winner. eSATA interfaces are also much more common on cable and fiber TV DVRs at home, so you can expand your storage easily with an eSATA drive.

#Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata portable#

Before USB 3.0, powered eSATA (aka, eSATA+USB 2.0) was the way to get a fast portable drive working with a laptop without having to use a power adapter for the drive.ĮSATA still has its place: IT managers can control the use of external hard drives and USB sticks by disabling USB ports on client PCs, while still supporting external drives for the people that need them by using eSATA. That way the PC's motherboard chipset only has to deal with one drive at a time, and not with multiple devices simultaneously, as with USB. Each eSATA device connects on a one-to-one basis with the PC, so you're not sharing the signal via an internal or external hub. You'll find it was the "fastest" throughput interface (1.5 Gbps to 6 Gbps) on most PCs before the advent of USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt (10 Gbps). Seen in systems like professional workstations and graphics artists' high-end PCs, eSATA has the benefit of being designed to work with hard drives primarily, while USB needs to be compatible with many other functions (mouse, keyboard, audio interface, charging, etc.). That said, USB's commonaility make it the go-to interface over more esoteric interfaces like eSATA, Fibre Channel, and Thunderbolt.ĮSATA has always been considered a professional interface when compared with USB. You'll never get exactly that 5Gbps throughput, since a) it's shared among the multiple ports connected to the same USB host controller, and b) many devices themselves aren't capable of reaching that level of throughput (spinning hard drives are a prime example). USB 2.0 tops out at 480Mbps, glacial compared to the 5 Gbps of USB 3.0. Once USB 2.0 took off in the 2000s, you could start connecting peripherals that stored data like digital media players, USB flash keys, and external hard drives. USB 1.1 started the ball rolling, but is really only useful for communicating with printers, mice, and keyboards. It began to come standard on Toshiba laptops and Apple desktops in the late 1990s now just about every system comes with at least one USB port so it can connect to peripherals like printers, mice, keyboards, external hard drives, scanners, and the like.

#Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata serial#

The Universal Serial Bus (USB) interface is ubiquitous. At home and in the office, which would I use and why? Then there's the professional-class eSATA port found on performance PCs, which is physically incompatible with USB, but is still found on desktop replacement laptops and on tower desktops. These ports are usually (but not always) colored blue to differentiate them from older, slower USB 2.0 ports. If you've been paying attention to the ports on new PC and Mac desktops and laptops, you'll see that just about all of them come with "new, faster" USB 3.0 ports.

#Usb 3 transfer rate vs esata software#